Review: Lords of England (1920s)


For those of you that don’t know.

There have been quite a few cigar companies that have gone out of business in the last 200 years (especially in Cuba), but even I was not aware of how many there were. Perelman’s Pocket Cyclopedia of Havana Cigars says it thusly:

New brands have been introduced almost continuously since 1810, when Benardino Rencurrel
filed the first trademark registration, followed in the same year by Hija de Cabañas y Carbajal.
One observer estimated that as many as 800 brands were in circulation by 1859, although in
1887, there were only 348 registered brands.

At the time of nationalization, there were reported to be 960 registered trademarks for cigars in
Cuba, not to mention hundreds of old, discontinued brand trade names. The following list
provides the names of 24 current (in bold) and 1,726 now-discontinued export brands which
were produced in Cuba between 1810 and the nationalization of the tobacco industry in
September 1960.

Lords of England is one of those discontinued brands. There is precious little information about this line of cigars, as it seems to have been discontinued sometime in the early to mid 1900s.

However, I have been able to confirm that these cigars were produced in Cuba (unlike Clear Havanas, which were produced in America using some Cuban tobacco) sometime in the early 1920s. They came in boxes of 50 cigars, with 10 cigars each of 5 different vitolas (although I have been unable to find specifics on the vitolas, I know this because the wonderful BOTL who traded these to me also sent me photos of the box they came in, which you can see below). One seems to be a vitola much like a Petite Lancero, and the other 4 are very close to one other, both in length and Ring Gauge, however, all of the cigars are box pressed, and two of the vitolas are perfectos. [Photos by Roy Vergado]:

Lords of England (1920s) 1.png

Lords of England (1920s) 2.png

Lords of England (1920s) 3.png

But enough of that, lets get down to business, shall we?

Lords of England (1920s) 4.png

  • Cigar Reviewed: Lords of England (1920s)
  • Country of Origin: Cuba
  • Factory: N/A
  • Wrapper: Cuba
  • Binder: Cuba
  • Filler: Cuba
  • Size: 5 Inches
  • Ring Gauge: 40ish
  • Vitola: Box Pressed Perfecto
  • Est. Price: $150.00 (rough estimate based on age and rarity)
  • Release Date: 1920′s
  • Number of Cigars Released: N/A
  • Number of Cigars Smoked for Review: 1

The cigar itself is an amazing specimen, especially considering it’s age. It is obviously well constructed, with a great cap no veins visible. The wrapper is light brown, quite dry (almost like parchment) and surprisingly smells quite a bit like cinnamon with a sweet undertone. The cigar is a box pressed perfecto, is very firm when squeezed, and is quite lumpy up and down the length. The band is one of the most amazing examples of craftsmanship I have seen in quite a while. If there is a Hall of Fame for cigar bands, this one belongs in it, without question. It just screams “quality”, and you know just by looking at it that this was not a cheap cigar when it was sold (although sadly, I have been unable to find an original price for them as of yet).

The First Third started out with a Bang, with quite a bit of spice on the tongue (a surprising amount, really), and flavors of oak and nuts. During the entire First Third, the profile shifted from spicy to sweet at random times, keeping me on my toes. A great start to the cigar.

Lords of England (1920s) 5.png

Between the 1st and 2nd thirds, I noticed the excellent burn line, and had to take a photograph of it.

Lords of England (1920s) 6.png

The Second Third started out wonderfully spicy and sweet (still with quite a bit of oak flavors), but added a fairly strong note of Vanilla and a hint of a floral note as well (but it never came close to coming out of the background of the profile). The sweetness also started diminishing at the end of this third.

Lords of England (1920s) 7.png

The Final Third did not exactly fall apart, but the sweetness that was present in the first 2 thirds left complexly, and I was left with a spicy, leathery flavor that had just a hint of tart nuttiness as well. It did not turn mild however, and stayed that way until the end of the smoke.

Lords of England (1920s) 8.png

 

Final Notes:

  • While smoking this cigar, my eyes were continuously drawn the aforementioned band. Just a great example of what cigars bands can be.
  • The amount of spice that was present in this cigar was really astounding. It made all the flavors that I tasted that much more enjoyable, and to have that amount of flavors and spice in a cigar this old speaks volumes about the quality of tobacco that was used when it was rolled almost 100 years ago.
  • This cigar had quite a few things that were perfect about it. Perfect Draw, Perfect Burn and the Perfect amount of smoke.
  • I figured that each puff I took was equal to about a year of it’s age.
  • The Final Smoking Time on this cigar was 1 Hour and 15 Minutes.

The Bottom Line: Considering the track record I have had with some vintage cigars so far (ranging from just an average smoke like the 1954 H. Upmann Belvedere, to tasting “like licking an old person”, like the Farach Farachitos Pre Embargo Cuban, this cigar surprised the hell out of me! I knew it would be different experience then the others I have smoked (it is the oldest I cigar I have smoked at around 90 years old, and is a true Cuban, made with all Cuban tobacco, unlike most of the others in this series, which have been Clear Havanas), but honestly, this cigar is in a class by itself. Perfect construction, and an astounding amount of flavor and spice made this an absolute joy to smoke. With quite a few other vintage smokes, there is always an urge to make excuses (“Sure, it tastes like shit, but it is like 60 years old!”), with this cigar, not excuses are necessary. I would put this cigar against 90% of the smokes that are being released today, and it would win. I would give it quite a high score, if I could.

Lords of England (1920s) 9.png

78 comments
Danny Moya
Danny Moya

WOW! I can't believe a cigar that old is such a great smoke. You are a lucky man to be able to smoke it. My good friend Carlos showed me this review last night during dinner at a friends birthday party. I WISH I COULD SMOKE ONE!!!!!!!

David
David

This is by far the oldest cigar I have ever seen reviewed. Unreal. I figured they would have turned to dust in that amount of time.

Joe
Joe

Shameless contest entry. Great review Brooks!

benzopyrene
benzopyrene

Amigo! These are some beautiful smokes for sure! Wow!

Ant
Ant

How does anyone have the will power to hang on to a box of Cubans for 90 years without smoking them!?! 90 days would be pushing it for me!

Robbie
Robbie

Great review of a wonderful cigar. These were stored very well.

Logan
Logan

Very nice review. Nice to see a review on a rare Cuban and not be a clear Havana

ama
ama

This is very cool. Thanks.

Ben
Ben

Im amazed this thing still had that much flavor! Nice review.

PeteRI
PeteRI

Brooks, you continue to top yourself. I especially like the picture you took between the 1st and 2nd third...beautiful composition, with contrast between sharp and soft focus...and love the green colors and diffuse elements in the background. You are a true artiste!

AlbanyCO
AlbanyCO

I can't believe that cigar is that old and has flavor like that. How were they stored?

mbflash80
mbflash80

wow...never heard of this until now...sounds fun! Thanks for the review Brooks...

Mike D.
Mike D.

Suprised Churchill didn't smoke those all up!

Mike D.
Mike D.

Suprised Churchill didn't smoke all those up!

Ryan
Ryan

I had the pleasure of smoking one of these gems w/ my dad...courtesy of Roy (Kona).

I loved it and have the same exact sentiment as you did in your review. In fact, our reviews would be almost identical. I've definitely had a differnece in opinion w/ some of your experiences with a stick vs mine....but this is right on the money. Thanks for the review! Wish I had that box!

Ryan

Cateacher
Cateacher

What a great looking cigar! Glad to hear you enjoyed it.

Ryan c
Ryan c

That's crazy! You never really hear of cigars older than 60 years being flavorful, let alone cigars 90years old.

JoshK
JoshK

This must be what the Fat Cats smoked before the Great Deperession. Awesome. Even with them being in the box I can't believe they held up that well. Nice score Brooks.

Cuban Pete
Cuban Pete

Awesome find Brooks. And like always great review and pictures! Thanks for the site.

Keith1911
Keith1911

Great review! The age and the condition of these cigars are amazing! I'd love to try one.

Dan
Dan

Beautiful smoke! That cigar is in amazing condition considering the age - just goes to show you how important proper storage conditions can be.

ChrisM
ChrisM

Thanks for another great review and giveaway!

dj
dj

Nice score!

DougBushBC
DougBushBC

What a gorgeous old cigar, gotta love the way they packed them in there with the five sections.

JimB
JimB

Really beautiful rustic cigars, I'm glad it went better than some other vintage cigars.

Sam Heimer
Sam Heimer

if only you could film this cigars journey like that red violin movie...

James TF
James TF

Amazing, that is some serious tobacco!

Guy
Guy

Fantastic review and photos Brooks.

I have smoked quite a few oldie's in my cigar life but none that
have tasted THAT good . Everything depends on how they were kept
over that period of time, looks like these were kept as good as if they were
in Dunhill's maturing rooms in London. who knows, maybe they were !!

Guy,
France

Yiorgos
Yiorgos

It is great when you see a cigar with almost 90 years of age still smoking well. Nice review Brooks!

donutboy2000
donutboy2000

And some say that the cigars being made today are the best ever.

J.A.S.
J.A.S.

congratulations Brooks; even if only one of us will get to try this cigar your review made possible for the rest of us to imagine it!!

Benji
Benji

How cool is that! A 90 year old cigar is a fogie of a stogie indeed!

jake79
jake79

Amazing presentation of these old cigars. I love how they used to box diffrent vitolas in the same box.

Goldie
Goldie

I can't imagine a cigar from the 20's. Nice review.

jpm
jpm

I want one!

JohnE
JohnE

Wow, sounds like a great smoke.
Thanks for the review.

Aaron U
Aaron U

Wow this review shocked me. You've had some bad luck with older cigars in the past.

Great review.

HabanoHam
HabanoHam

Great Review Brooks! I'm still amazed at how a stick this old can still pack so much flavor!

Luca
Luca

Loved the review...

AlohaStyle
AlohaStyle

Great review... it's crazy to me how cigars that old can still have the spice!

Danny S
Danny S

Your vintage reviews blows the Cigar Aficionado Vintage out of the water~!

LiLo
LiLo

way to go brooks. Killer smoke!

khenry0105
khenry0105

What a cool experience - very nice review.

Tam
Tam

I know Roy, he's a cool guy with alot of rare smokes.

Dparrish
Dparrish

Thats just crazy that something that old is still flavorful and has that much depth.. I hope I do when im 80+

Cigarguy88
Cigarguy88

Brooks nice review as always. Glad to here Steve joined in to help out.... btw you are insane to give one of these away :)

Tony (issues)
Tony (issues)

Great review Brooks!!!

What an amazing treat it must've been getting the chance to review such a beautiful cigar...

I truly envy you!

Santiaguero
Santiaguero

Thanks for the review, vere generous contest.