Review: Casa de Montecristo B-56

The story of the Casa de Montecristo B-56 goes like this: Sam Khalil, owner of Casa de Montecristo in Chicago, was in Miami in February with one of his sales reps who introduced him to “an old Cuban guy” that was supposedly amongst the first person to roll Cuban Behike BHKs. Fast forward a bit and the “old Cuban guy” is living in Miami with a 7′ x 7′ humidor he built in his closet with supplies from a hardware store. When he met Khalil, he told him he could roll him a BHK, Sam wanted to see if it was true. Despite instructions to let the cigar sit for a while, Khalil lit it up and loved the blend. He proceeded to ask how many can be rolled for him, with the man telling him 150 a day and that he has between 4–5,000 already made and being aged. Khalil came to an agreement with the roller, and the first of two shipments of 1,000 came in mid-March in bundles looking like this: Casa de Montecristo B56 Bundle 1 Casa de Montecristo B56 Bundle 2


_______________________________________________________________________


Unfortunately, Khalil acknowledged that while the B-56s are rolled to a 56 ring gauge, they shrink down to a 54. As such he is planning three new sizes that will be identical to the Behike BHK, which are:

  • BHK 52: 4 2/3 x 52
  • BHK 54: 5 2/3 x 54
  • BHK 56: 6 1/2 x 56

While the Casa de Montecristo and TopQualityCigars websites still remain mum on the blend, Khalil told halfwheel it uses a Nicaraguan wrapper with 25% Columbia tobacco, 25% Nicaraguan tobacco, although he refrained from discussing the remainder of the filler blend.


_______________________________________________________________________


Here’s a picture of the Casa de Montecristo B-56 (top) and Behike BHK56 (bottom): Cohiba Behike BHK 56  Casa de Montecristo B 56


_______________________________________________________________________


Now that we’ve got that out of the way, let’s light this stick up. Casa de Montecristo B 56 1

  • Cigar Reviewed: Casa de Montecristo B-56
  • Country of Origin: USA
  • Factory: n/a
  • Wrapper: Nicaragua
  • Binder: Undisclosed
  • Filler: Columbia, Nicaragua & Undisclosed
  • Size: 6 1/2 Inches
  • Ring Gauge: 56
  • Vitola: Toro Gordo
  • MSRP: $15.95 (Samplers of 5, $79.75)
  • Date Released: June 22, 2012
  • Number of Cigars Released: 100 Bundles of 20 Cigars (2,000 Total Cigars Released)*
  • Number of Cigars Smoked For Review: 3

*The first two shipments contained 1,000 cigars each. Apparently another 4–5,000 are sitting in an aging room in Miami.

While the B-56 is attractive on its own, you really see the differences in wrapper leaf above. The B-56 has more veins than its namesake and the seams on the wrapper show much more prominently. The pre-light aroma has notes of brown sugar, banana bread and cedar, with the cold draw going nearly unchallenged and showing varying notes of banana and sourdough bread, which create a back and forth of sweet and sour on the palate. The B-56 has a fair amount of give to it, although I wouldn’t go so far as to say it’s under filled.

 


_______________________________________________________________________


The first third of the B-56 starts off with a sour note that is far from enjoyable. That subsides within the first inch or so, leaving behind a bready note which conjures up several different ideas in my head, from sourdough to banana bread. Smoke volume is good, falling short of billowing. The flavor stays light for most of this third with almost no spice or pepper. Ash of the Miami-made cigar is dark and grey, seemingly trying its best to make it all the way to solid black. Casa de Montecristo B 56 2 Flavor of the second third comes and goes without much fanfare until the transition to the final third, where the flavor becomes a bit heavier, starting with bread crust and transitioning into some charred chicken notes. A touch of white pepper comes out here as well, adding just a bit of zing to the equation. Casa de Montecristo B 56 3 A continuation of the white pepper and charred notes carry the B-56 into its final third, but the subtleties and complexities of a cigar trying to position itself in the class of a Cuban Cohiba Behike BHK simply are not there. The third cigar, smoked after dinner, left a sour, almost bitter taste on the palate that sealed the verdict on the B-56. Casa de Montecristo B 56 4


_______________________________________________________________________


Final Notes:

  • Let me say something good about this cigar – it burns phenomenally. Only one of the three cigars ever needed a relight or touch-up, and that was due to me having to step away from it for a few minutes.
  • I can’t help but chuckle when I read that this cigar reveals the “secret of the BEHIKE blend.” Wouldn’t part of that secret be Cuban tobacco and wouldn’t that also imply that there is some non-Cuban tobacco in the original Behike? It just doesn’t seem likely.
  • As you can see in the above photo, the wrapper shade is quite different between the B-56 and a BHK, and it’s nowhere near as close as the Casa de Montecristo website makes them out to be.
  • TopQualityCigars.com, the online store operated by Casa de Montecristo, quotes the price of a single Cohiba Behike BHK 56 at  €62.99, or just over $77.00. While that price may be accurate in some parts of the world, the actual price can vary quite widely depending on local taxes and retailer markup, so take that number with a grain of salt.
  • While the cigar is said to be the same, one thing that certainly isn’t is the packaging. While the Cuban Behike comes in a gorgeous 10–count black lacquer box inside a black felt bag, the B-56 comes in a paper bundle of 20.
  • To Charlie’s knowledge, the first known non-Cuban cigar to attempt to mimic the BHK was J.R. Cigars. The popular retailer introduced the Cohiba Behike Laguito No. 6 (6 1/2 x 56) as part of its J.R. Edición Limitada series. Although given the picture on the JR site, it would be hard to confuse the BHK with its copy.
  • Those knowledgable about Cuban cigars will recall that the Cohiba Behike has had two releases: the more recent trio that came out in 2010, and a 2006 release that came in a commemorative 40th anniversary humidor. Those cigars measured 7 2/3 x 52, a Double Robusto vitola, and were limited to 100 numbered humidors, each containing 40 cigars for a total run of 4,000 cigars. Oh yeah—and Brooks reviewed one to kick off halfwheel.
  • Also in Brooks’ review of that original Behike, a picture of the person who rolled all those first Behikes: Norma Fernández.
  • The name B-56 seemed familiar when I first heard it, though I was likely thinking of B-52. Among other things named B-56: a Scandinavian women’s clothing company and a Boeing military bomber jet. The B-52 is a more widely used term, including a well-known band, a bomber jet, a softball bat, a pro audio company and a shot.
  • This is the second cigar in recent weeks to bear a striking resemblance to the Cuban Cohiba Behike BHK 56, with the other being the flagship line from L’Atelier, a new company being overseen by Pete Johnson of Tatuaje. That cigar will formally debut at the upcoming IPCPR convention and trade show in early August.
  • The cigars were provided by site sponsor Casa de Montecristo for review.
  • Final smoking time is about one hour and 45 minutes.
  • If you would like to purchase the Casa de Montecristo B-56, you can purchase them from site sponsor TopQualityCigars here.


_______________________________________________________________________


The Bottom Line: Going into this review, I couldn’t help but think that I was going to be smoking a knock-off cigar – a product simply trying to capitalize on the success and notoriety of the Cuban Cohiba Behike. Despite a real effort to find something in the cigar to prove otherwise, I  just couldn’t. Make no mistake about it – this is no Behike. None of the three cigars left me really wanting another one, and if anything made me want to grab something else to put a better taste on my palate. If you’re looking for the flavors of a Cuban Cohiba Behike, you’re still better off going with the real thing. If you think that by smoking the B-56 you’ll get a good idea of what the Cuban Cohiba Behike BHK 56 tastes like, you’ll be wrong, and sadly disappointed.



Final Score: 73

15 comments
TheCasualCigar
TheCasualCigar

Had one of these, and I could not disagree more with your review.  This thing was quality from the first puff to the nub.  Sour notes?  Never had any.  Charred Chicken?  There is a subtly sweet toasty flavor, but it is far from burnt chicken.

 

"Going into this review, I couldn’t help but think that I was going to be smoking a knock-off cigar"  And judging by your review, it seems as if you in no way were going to convinced otherwise.  

 

The flavor was fantastic, and there was not a hint of bitterness any where in it.  A great blend of nuts, granola, and toasty flavors. As far as the comment "grab something else, to put a better taste on my palate" goes, the aftertaste of the B-56 may be one of the best parts of the cigar.

 

I was slightly underwhelmed by it's complexity, but it's hard to complain when the cigar had great flavor.

 

It's not an exact Behike.  But it is a lot closer than you make it out to be.

 

The review is an example of cigar snobbery at it's finest.

Moops
Moops

I am smoking one right now from November. Moving into the 2nd 3rd I have not experienced any sourness that you mentioned. The construction is impeccable, the burn is fantastic, I did not have to ash through the entire 1st third. I found a nice nuttyness reminiscent of toasted sesame. I am getting a nice charred flavor, but it does not remind me of burnt chicken; instead it is more like a grilled bruschetta (a charred bread). Almost reminds me of when you are sitting in your yard or on the patio and someone a few blocks away has a fire going. The smoke is smooth and creamy There is a slight pepper nuance with the finish that I get in the back of my throat; it is a nice heat. I am actually enjoying this smoke quite a bit, picturing it after a nice steak au poivre cooked medium with a glass of peppery merlot. 

dshelby
dshelby

Smoked the cigar, I personally thought it was really good. Had a nice even burn, I can honestly say I smoked a couple and found the best way to really enjoy the cigar is with a bullet cut. I have smoked a few Behike and it was closer in flavor to the 54 than the 56.

PHXCigarGuy
PHXCigarGuy

 @dshelby Interesting that you found it closer to the 54 than the 56. As I mentioned, the burn was absolutely fantastic on these, which it sounds like you experienced as well. I clipped each of the caps - I'd be interested to try the bullet cut, Shuriken or even a V-cut for a different experience.

dshelby
dshelby

 @PHXCigarGuy I'm amazed you only rated the cigar at a 73, I may be wrong but isn't  part of the rating process the burn and the draw of a cigar. Now if I remember correctly your comments were that they were fantastic. I personally think that the rating that you gave this particular cigar would be one that was poor in all three categories. Sometimes it's cool to admit that you were wrong about only giving the cigar a 73 for its rating.

PHXCigarGuy
PHXCigarGuy

 @dshelby You're right in that burn and draw are part of the score, but as Charlie mentioned, they don't make up for flavor, which in my experience was simply less than ideal and struggled at times to even be acceptable. I think the key note in my review is that having smoked three of them, I can't say I want another one. That's much more important than burn and draw.

Charlie Minato
Charlie Minato moderator

 @dshelby  @PHXCigarGuy Burn and draw don't make up for flavor. I still haven't smoked the B-56—so I can't provide much more than that, but they are not substitutes for one another.

absolutfedor
absolutfedor

Interesting.  Charred chicken like tasty bbq burned bits, sounds inviting actually.  

 

For what it's worth, the actual behikes aren't that much better...yet (I pray).

 

Still one of the better retailers by far, can't blame them for buying in to a behike copy run, people love them obviously.

Paulie G
Paulie G

What shipment did yours come from?  I was lucky enough to get one from the original bundle Sam brought back in May.  I held onto it and smoked it at the BOTL herf and I enjoyed it quite a bit.  I didnt get any of the sourness you described or charred chicken.  I experienced a woodsy sweetness with a little pepper.  I will say that it is pricey and I didn't enjoy it enough to stock up on them but I think they're worth trying once or twice.  For the price I'd rather spend a few extra $$ and get a Small Batch.

PHXCigarGuy
PHXCigarGuy

 @Paulie G Honestly I don't know -- but I'm glad to hear you had a different experience. Given the somewhat uncertain provenance of both cigars and raw ingredients, I'm not surprised to hear of varying experiences.

Mafongo
Mafongo

"Charred Chicken": don't think I have ever seen that noted in any cigar review, by anyone, ever.

PHXCigarGuy
PHXCigarGuy

 @Mafongo I try and surprise every once in a while...there's a dish of grilled chicken I remember having several times and really enjoying, but once it came out a bit too grilled, to the point of being charred. I can't get that taste out of my memory.

Trent0341
Trent0341

 @Mafongo Nor would it be one I'd want to see haha.  Looks like I won't be giving these a try.

JackLinos
JackLinos

It says so much when from the outset, when someone tries to imitate (read, CAPITAL-ize) another cigar, especially a Behike. People either love them, hate them, or don't think they are worth the money. Either way, fine. But for me, it has always been a rich and unique smoke and the ones I have from early 2010 smoke better everyday. 

skinnykenny
skinnykenny

WOW, that's what I said. I was gifted one to try, mind you I've never had a Behike, but I've had cubans (not a lot but enough). I thought if this is what a Behike taste like keep it. I got to the point, I couldn't and didn't want to finish it. I would how ever like to see what they would smoke like in a year.