Weekly News (February 18, 2013)


Editor’s Note: The cigar industry has a disclosure problem. It’s nothing new and beginning to be a well-documented complaint as the level of knowledge amongst a minority of consumers increases. At every juncture, the cigar industry collectively seems to get away with not disclosing more than most seem logical: blend changes, tobacco origins, production sizes, factory locations are all oftentimes undisclosed, and sometimes even worse—lied about.

While all of these are obvious issues for me, time and time again I see manufacturers not disclosing something else, much smaller, much less significant, but entirely necessary.

Earlier this month Stogie Guys published an editorial discussing the need to pay attention to when a cigar was rated and made a strong case as to why it’s key, something I agree with. But it’s also time for manufacturers to start also including where something was rated.

Now, more often than not, cigars are simply described as “93 rated,” and not “93 rated from…” It’s bad, misleading and at times laughable. I’m of the belief that ratings are a bit overhyped in the industry, but if one is going to use ratings in marketing material, let’s do it properly.

The other day I saw a manufacturer tweet that a cigar was “cigar of the year.” I can’t tell you where that cigar was listed as cigar of the year, I looked. And I’d like to think that I have a decent grasp on the lists that were produced this past year, or at least the relevant ones.

Disclosure is going to be something the cigar industry fights against, it already is, and so it will be a long road in order to get manufacturers to fess up to blend changes, but letting the industry get away with new types of non-disclosure is not a good idea because information really just becomes misinformation.

  • Room101 Master Collection — Story here.
  • J.D. Howard Reserve Coming from Crowned Heads Here.
  • L’Atelier LAT 46 SS Scheduled for March, Maduro Ships in May — Story here.
  • Black Market Punk Coming from Alec Bradley — Story here.
     La Aurora 107 Maduro.png
  • La Aurora 107 Maduro Nears Arrival — The new 107 Maduro gets closer to a release. Via Barry Stein.
  • Limited Edition Casa Martin Coming — Details here.
  • Intemperance Lonsdales Coming — Details here.
  • Chesapeake Cigar Gets La Aurora 107 8 x 60 — Details here.
  • La Barba Cigars Sees September Release — Details here.
  • La Gloria Cubana Adds Serie R Little Belicoso Here.
  • Alec Bradley Prepares Nica Puro Shipment — Details here.
  • East India Cargo Chest Ships from Gurkha — Here.
  • La Aurora Gets Own Rum — Expected to debut this week at ProCigar. No word on U.S. debut.
  • IPCPR Tables Consumer Day, Increases Dues Here.
  • H.R. 792 Replaces H.R. 1639 — Details here.
  • Legislative Victory in Oklahoma — Story here.
  • Romeo y Julieta Churchills Reserva 2008 Prepares to Ship — Press release here.
  • La Palina Decreases Prices — Press release here.
  • General Cigar Launches New Website — Press release here.
8 comments
Toro
Toro

Am I the only one who thinks its ironic that the disclosure problem comment (which I agree with) is flanked top and bottom by a Heisenburg ad? lol

MisterBastahrd
MisterBastahrd

@elninodiablo I've been making that case for years. DPG Blue label 2005/06 vs. 2012 anyone? Even Punch and HdM are not immune

MattSRoss81
MattSRoss81

@elninodiablo Even more than comment...IRISH stated everything well so felt no need!

LkyLindy
LkyLindy

I love it when a vitola is rated 93 by "Bob in Oklahoma" or some other internet expert--What a Joke

Capttrips
Capttrips

Charlie, I couldn't agree with you more. The secrecy and misinformation isn't good for the consumer or for business. All the guys need to get together in the same room and have a "cigar summit" or state of the industry.

As far as ratings, there are only a few I put any weight in and one is Halfwheel. Some of the others are purely $$$$ driven and unreliable.

Thanks for the great service Halfwheel provides.

Dave

TobaccoMan1
TobaccoMan1

In agreement as well. Since there are so many companies that are coming out now (literally everytime I turn around) These companies need to be more responsible and definitely list the source of the ratings. I can't keep up anymore.

djshalifoe
djshalifoe

As much as is feasible, it's way past time to emulate the fine wine industry. And now more than ever, cigar manufacturers need to realize that if they don't regulate themselves, the FDA will gladly do it for them. None of us want that...

THE Daddy Irish
THE Daddy Irish

Couldn't agree more with the editors note. Ratings seem entirely subjective instead of what the EXPERIENCE is like, and anyone can rate something as 90+ or "Cigar of the Year". If you will make that claim cite your sources, in every other industry and most professions in general it is required, this should be no different. I understand that marketing and business will always drive campaigns and gimmicks, but when making a "documented" claim put some pride and respect behind it. Just my two cents but I do agree with you Charlie.